Yes, a small shame, but that’s what JBridge is for. 
I have the same problem with Cubase 9, since it has gone 64 bit only. Whilst most of my plugins are 64 bit, there are a few that are not (including Steinberg ones that I paid good money for!). JBridge seems to be better and more stable than Steinbergs old native bridge!
“The free virtual instrument is an emulation of the Yamaha CS-80 synthesizer and has been released as a tribute to sound designer Armin Kujashi. Armin decided to contribute with a Vangelis inspired soundbank (128 patches) for this new synth.”
Source: http://www.flstudiomusic.com/2017/06/krakli-plugins-arminator-free-vst-instrument-synthesizer.html
I’ve been playing with Arminator this evening, and it’s a nice little plugin with some good analogue sounds, and stunning that it’s free. I would say it’s not quite as authentic as Arturia CS-80v, particularly in that it doesn’t model the original architecture/controls quite so closely (for example each oscillator has a separate glide control, no brilliance controls, and has built-in “bit crusher” effect). But a great additional tool for your armoury of sounds.
Neil
I’ve been noodling with the Arminator andI absolutely love it. I think I like it more than the Arturia!
My Elka MK88 has Poly AT and it works just beautifully with this thing. It was always that combination of LPF/HPF under Poly AT which gave the CS-80 its mojo, and this thing, along with all the midi control one gets of balance between the various sections makes it one of the most satisfying instruments to play since… the CS-80!
Some of the programming is a little crude, with way too much action at the bottom of some sliders, and as the interface is a little cramped, you have to be careful dialing stuff in. A few controllers and parameter taming, courtesy of Cantabile, and it really captures the soul of the original, while bringing its own ‘thing’. It’s more of a tribute than a copy.
If Ian does 64 bit version with a couple of important enhancements, such as Poly AT to the LFOs, and the keyboard control to filter/amp that the CS-80 had, it will be a real contender.
Arturia V Collection is now on sale for €199. I’m just wondering if I should go ahead and buy it? I must that I do like the very lean Analog Lab version that came free with my Keylab mkii. How playable are these synths in a live situation?
We were discussing this 2 weeks ago. @Howifeel was asking mostly the same thing. Read thru this area…
Building a new rig -- RAM thoughts
Basically, Analog Lab is leaner on cpu, but leaner on programming. I find most everything I need in the Lab. Some 6500 presets from all the instruments. Works very well live. Most of the synths sound great…B3 terrible…Piano and
E Pianos…not my favorite.
Did they fix the issues with touchscreens? A year ago I installed the arturia-plugins and then I realized I’m not able to control them because non of them worked with touchscreens…
I immediately loved Arturia after I bought it. The mistake I made was messing with each synth individually. It became a programming god when I discovered analog lab was all I needed to load to access a Vox intro for “Can’t get enough of you baby” on one song, Oberheim for “What have you done for me lately” for the next with a simple C3 program change. Piano is actually okay. B3 is a hell no. All accessable and customizable from that single interface using only 1 C3 slot. I love this thing. Hours and hours of fun, and when the band is looking for a certain sound, I can easily call it up. The patch organization in analog lab is stunning.
I’ve started really kind of digging the piano. I like the jazz piano sound.
Yes. I like that one. The best thing is the clarity and the roll off of the lows (eq). Sits well in a band mix. Not having to open another program for piano is a good thing. My band requires a lot of diverse classic sounds, and this seamlessly switches between them. The A200 and Rhodes don’t meet the NI standard, though.
Like Sitar and a Theremin ? 
Dulcimer especially.
I agree, the electric pianos and Hammond are bottom of the barrel. I don’t know why they bother with so much competition. The collection is a great value without those.
It wasn’t a grave disappointment, as I favor my NI A200 and Rhodes deeply. Even the venerable LL doesn’t measure up (maybe the wurly), and the XLN Rhodes didn’t do it for me. Blue 3 has taken me by storm. I love that B3. Since @Ade stated the CS-80 his one of his focuses when playing, I am checking it out. Maybe I can be famous some day.
I love the CS80 so much… 
In fact I basically did an entire album with it that will never see the light of day, dang it.
Not about Arturia but on the CS80 front I have been hooked by the ME80 sim from Memorymoon. I have a K2600 so it has aftertouch and the ribbon controller just like the original and makes playing the plugin way fun. I had A CS60 for years and the playing of it was an entirely new art and music skill to learn. But by far I made more conehead music with that synth and an SH101 than anything else. The ring modulator is magic!! The GUI is not as snazzy as CS80V but it’s fine and laid out like the original so it’s easy to find all the controls if you had a CS series type before. Going from memory this synth sounds very good compared to the real deal to me … anyway my 2 cents.
Dave
I like their stuff. It seems like in the long run I did feel like Arturia did sound better but I haven’t tried ME80 in a while. And it shouldn’t really matter but the fact that the Arturia GUIs look so good is actually a factor- my brain wants to think that things that look good sound good 
The actual MemoryMoon MemoryMoog was pretty cool.
Hi Have the ME80 too and love it. I use it a lot.
I’m really digging the voice stacking capabilty. Super fat Bass patches. And something my CS60 didn’t have which is the swtchable square/sawtooth option for the PWM controls on each strip for the oscillators and the switchable Sine/Triangle wave in the VCA and it has a really low resource footprint. It’s appears to be well coded. Lots to play with here … 