Hi Brad,
here I am sending snaps of MIDI data from Cantabile v3176 and v3179. I see that the velocity influences more than one columns of data.
I have my own program to display of MIDI data. In it I obtained the following information:
Status: 176 ( for pad On and pad Off)
MIDI Data 1: 5 ( for pad On and pad Off; this is the CC Number, there´s a number for each pad.
MIDI Data 2: 127 for pad On; 0 for pad Off
Excuseme by the quantity of posts.
Regards,
Gustavo
OK so looks like these are velocity sensitive pads sending different CC values depending how hard pressed. Thses should be bindable using “Controller (Button)” or “Controller (No Edge Button)” - if not, let me know what you’re trying to bind to and I’ll check it out.
Hi Brad, I’m using build 3192. Please see the attached snap. In this version, my pads work with the value “on” and “off”, but do not work with the “toggle” value, which is I need … that it worked well with v3177.
I was wondering whether anyone else could see the benefit of binding a binding(s) to a binding.
When this is coupled with the forthcoming knobs/sliders etc facility, binding to binding(s) could provide a kind of parameter grouping function with the ability to float between different configs seamlessly using the existing binding mute/enable functionality.
One issue to watch out for would be maintaining the relative position between bindings which are being addressed by a given master binding.
Does this sound feasible and appealing to anyone?
Interesting idea, but I’ve also been thinking lately that some aspects of bindings are a bit too involved and as part of that I was actually thinking about the ability to switch between sets of bindings. Haven’t thought about it much beyond that.
In the meantime, I think the best way to do this is by using states to control which bindings are active and bind to the states to switch.
Hi @brad
The difference here is that such a binding provides dynamic control of multiple destinations from one master, and that master can be determined by which states are active.
A bit like a VCA group on a mixer.
A practical example might be having the filters of several synths each discretely controllable by their own binding - but those bindings being universally influenced by a master binding, with the option to bias relatively or absolutely.
This would seem to anticipate an inevitable evolution resulting from Cantabile offering the user faders and knobs.
I’m new to this forum and to Cantabile 3 Performer. I hope this is the right place to pose this question.
I set up triggers to send Sysex Messages to my keyboard to turn off/on local. The triggers work perfectly when I select them.
I am using a touch screen monitor and would like to bind them to a toggle button on the controller bar.
I have tried to do a learn on the triggers to the button but that didn’t take. Can anyone guide me in the right direction, or is this even possible.